अधिवक्ता Archit Chaturvedi

अभ्यास कोर्ट्स

District Court

High Court

Tribunals

पेशेवर सारांश

Mumbai-based lawyer practising before the Bombay High Court, with experience across India, Canada, and the UAE, focusing on commercial litigation, dispute resolution, testamentary and estate planning/execution, and cross-border strategic legal advisory. Co-founder, C&T Advocates, a boutique law firm handling high-stakes commercial disputes and transactions with partner-led execution. Advises on shareholder disputes, corporate conflicts, contract drafting and enforcement, real estate and redevelopment matters, and banking and finance disputes, including recovery and enforcement actions. Represents businesses, financial institutions, developers, and private clients in high-value, complex matters involving litigation strategy, risk assessment, and multi-party disputes. Dispute Resolution | Commercial Litigation | Cross-Border Advisory | Corporate & Contract Advisory | Real Estate & Redevelopment | Banking & Finance | Bombay High Court ... अधिक वाचा

मुख्य साध्या

• 1. Appeared in a reported Bombay High Court judgment on minor child custody, where the Court, exercising parens patriae jurisdiction, granted custody.
• to the paternal aunt, prioritising the child’s long-term welfare and best interests over parental claims in circumstances where neither parent could
• demonstrate financial stability or a secure environment.
• 2. Appeared in a reported Bombay High Court judgment involving a government undertaking, upholding disciplinary proceedings and termination for
• prolonged unauthorised absence; addressed and rejected a whistleblower defence, clarified that due process compliance is determinative, allegations
• of malice require proper pleading and necessary parties, and judicial review in service matters does not extend to reappreciation of evidence.
• 3. Appeared in a constitutional challenge before the Bombay High Court questioning executive guidelines governing Look Out Circulars against alleged
• loan defaulters. The Court held that empowering banks to issue such circulars was ultra vires the applicable framework.
• 4. Represented the landowner in proceedings to clear large-scale encroachments involving several hundred unauthorised structures on privately owned
• land; successfully persuaded the municipality to initiate demolition proceedings and facilitated a structured, win-win resolution through the Slum
• Rehabilitation Authority framework in coordination with occupant associations.
• 5. Represented groups of flat purchasers in redevelopment disputes where the housing society terminated the development agreement and appointed a new
• developer, threatening the contractual rights of free sale purchasers who had already acquired flats; secured interim protection against demolition
• of a near-completed structure pending final adjudication.
• 6. Handled multi-party disputes in large township developments concerning federation charges, shared infrastructure obligations prior to conveyance,
• and enforcement of project-level common area management arrangements against occupants and associations.
• 7. Strategized and formulated representation for stakeholders in oppression and mismanagement proceedings involving directors’ disqualification
• under Sections 164(2) and 167 of the Companies Act; successfully demonstrated that non-filing of financial statements resulted from deliberate