Talk to a lawyer @499

News

Plea Challenges Internet Shutdown and Border Closure Amidst Farmers' Protest in Haryana

Feature Image for the blog - Plea Challenges Internet Shutdown and Border Closure Amidst Farmers' Protest in Haryana

In a legal challenge against the suspension of internet services and the closure of borders in response to farmers' preparations for a protest march, the Punjab and Haryana High Court is set to examine the issue. The plea, titled *Uday Pratap Singh v UOI & Ors*, highlights the impact of these measures on citizens' rights and democratic processes.

Uday Pratap Singh, the petitioner and a resident of Panchkula, contends that the sealing of the Haryana-Punjab border, particularly at Shambhu near Ambala, is unlawful. The farmers' scheduled 'Delhi Chalo' march on February 13, organized by various unions, seeks to address legitimate demands, including the implementation of a law guaranteeing a minimum support price (MSP) for crops.

Acting Chief Justice Gurmeet Singh Sandhawalia, presiding over the case, has sought a response from the State, with the matter scheduled for a hearing on Tuesday, February 13. The petitioner emphasizes that the farmers' right to peacefully protest is a fundamental aspect of their democratic rights.

Expressing concerns over the actions taken by Haryana authorities, the petitioner cites the suspension of mobile internet services and bulk SMS in several districts, including Ambala, Kurukshetra, Kaithal, Jind, Hisar, Fatehabad, and Sirsa. The plea argues that these measures, aimed at restricting information and communication, infringe upon citizens' rights.

The petition underscores the need for law enforcement actions to align with legal standards and respect fundamental rights. It raises alarms about the use of obstacles such as electrification, reinforced concrete walls, and barbed wire fences, stating that such measures risk undermining the foundations of a democratic society governed by the rule of law.

As the legal proceedings unfold, the case brings attention to the delicate balance between maintaining public order and upholding citizens' rights to peaceful assembly and access to information. The court's decision will likely influence the approach taken by authorities in managing protests while respecting democratic principles.

Author: Anushka Taraniya

News writer, MIT ADT University