Talk to a lawyer @499

News

SC On Manipur Violence - Court Proceedings Should Be Used To Exacerbate Violence Or Create Additional Issues

Feature Image for the blog - SC On Manipur Violence - Court Proceedings Should Be Used To Exacerbate Violence Or Create Additional Issues

During the proceedings regarding the violence in Manipur, the Supreme Court urged caution in using the situation to exacerbate violence or create additional issues. Chief Justice of India DY Chandrachud, leading the Bench, emphasized the need for a humanitarian approach, considering the Court's limitations in managing security and law and order.

The Court made the observation while hearing a group of petitions related to the Manipur violence between the Meitei and Kuki communities. The Solicitor General of India (SGI), Tushar Mehta, described the situation in Manipur as "constantly evolving" and presented a status report highlighting the efforts undertaken by the Central government to restore normalcy in the State.

Colin Gonsalves, a Senior Advocate representing the Kuki groups, expressed concerns about the escalating violence, contradicting the previous statement made by SG Mehta that reported only 10 deaths. Gonsalves stated that the number had increased to 110.

In response, the Chief Justice urged caution, emphasizing that skepticism should not prompt the Court to interfere in the law and order situation. He requested Gonsalves to provide specific suggestions during the next hearing. Gonsalves expressed his primary concern of apprehending the assailants, while SG Mehta highlighted the importance of understanding the ongoing situation and its underlying causes.

Following that, Chief Justice of India (CJI) Chandrachud raised the issue of weapons being seized from police stations and requested an update on the actions taken in response. The Chief Secretary of Manipur was instructed to submit a status report on the matter. Colin Gonsalves pointed out that the rise in violence was linked to banned terrorist groups under the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act (UAPA).

In response, the CJI reminded all parties involved that the Court served as a legal forum and should not assume the responsibilities of the elected government.