Supreme Court Demands Prompt Action on Digital Device Seizure Guidelines

The Supreme Court expressed discontent over the prolonged delay by the Central government in formulating guidelines for the search and seizure of personal digital devices by law enforcement agencies. The matter, raised in the case of *Foundation for Media Professionals vs Union of India and Ors*, prompted Justices Sanjay Kishan Kaul and Sudhanshu Dhulia to question the two-year lapse since the petition's filing.

Additional Solicitor General V Raju informed the bench about the committee's formation, ensuring a positive outcome but requesting more time. Justice Kaul, however, emphasized the need for a timeframe, stating, "When did we issue notice? Two years have passed, Mr Raju!"

The PILs, one by the Foundation for Media Professionals and the other by a group of academicians, stressed the necessity of guidelines for the search and seizure of digital devices, advocating for a civilized and Supreme Court-directed approach. Senior Advocate Nitya Ramakrishnan urged interim guidelines, citing recent raids on journalists.

The Court, acknowledging the gravity of the issue, expressed skepticism about the government's assurances. The ASG assured the guidelines' readiness by the next week, prompting the bench to assert, "Get it done." The delay raises concerns about unchecked powers in seizing devices containing a citizen's personal and professional life, highlighting the pressing need for clear directives in this evolving digital landscape.

Author: Anushka Taraniya

News Writer, MIT ADT University