Talk to a lawyer @499

Know The Law

Impeachment Of President Of India

Feature Image for the blog - Impeachment Of President Of India

The Impeachment of the President of India is a critical constitutional safeguard to ensure accountability in the nation's highest office. While never yet invoked, this quasi-judicial process remains crucial for addressing any instances of misconduct or incapacity by the President. The Constitution mandates a "special majority" of two-thirds from both the Lok Sabha and the Rajya Sabha, along with a joint committee investigation and a secret ballot, to uphold fairness and transparency in the impeachment proceedings. This process reinforces the integrity of presidential functions and maintains a check on the exercise of power in India.

What Is Impeachment?

To understand the topic presented, it's important that one clarifies the notion of "impeachment." The word "impeachment" is derived from the French word "empeechier," which means impede or hinder. In simple terms, impeachment checks whether such a person or action should be considered valid or good. Impeachment, in legal or administrative terms, is the formal determination to dismiss a person in public office because of grave misconduct or inability to discharge the duties of his office. This is looking for evidence and ascertaining whether or not the person involved committed acts that could result in dismissal.

Administratively, impeachment is a procedure charged against a government official that involves serious wrongdoing but is usually concerned with his role's performance. Traditionally, an individual is either removed from a position or deprived of the title once he has been convicted of any particular crime. Even in the Indian scenario, the use of impeachment lies not just against the head of State or even a vice President. Still, there is the scope that extends even for civil officials and also upon judges where impeachability remains, thereby keeping every aspect accountable according to Article 124(4), which also forms the constitution on which SC judges are even eligible to face impeachment with severe violations of any of these very offences. This way of doing things is said to ensure that those in power act responsibly and maintain the public trust vested in them.

When Can The President Be Impeached?

Article 56 of the Indian Constitution states that the President of India serves for five years, but in exceptional conditions, he or she vacates the office ahead of time. These are death, resignation under Article 56(a) and Article 56(2), impeachment for contravening the Constitution under Article 61, or a declaration by the Supreme Court voiding the President's election under Article 71. Each case is a distinct legal provision for the term and removal of the President so that the office will fulfil its constitutional mandate.

Impeachment is a severe process whereby the President can be removed even before the expiry of the five-year term. As per Article 56(1)(b) and Article 61(1), the President can be impeached by Parliament for violation of the Constitution. This provision vests in the hands of Parliament the right to hold the President answerable for acts contrary to constitutional mandates and, thus, protects the sanctity of the nation's highest office. Article 56(1)(b) clearly lays out that the President shall be removed "for violation of the Constitution," and it goes on to enunciate the procedure within Article 61.

Article 61 defines how to proceed, under which any House of Parliament can move appropriate impeachment charges against the President. In this regard, Clause (1) of Article 61 states that charges have to be presented by either Lok Sabha or Rajya Sabha, hence the bipartisan method to show legitimacy and fair play in the whole exercise. Therefore, this whole process of impeachment is grave enough, with proper detailed procedure having to be strictly followed before any motion could be put forward to take away the office of the President. Although the Constitution is clear about the process of impeachment, it has left the meaning of "violation of the Constitution" vague. This leaves the impeachment process complicated in many ways.

Since "violation of the Constitution" is vague, questions arise about what constitutes this phrase. Generally, such a breach could mean either actions or inactions that contradict what the president is supposed to do through constitutional directives and the oath taken under Article 60. Such acts may involve failure to discharge duties, treason, corruption, abuse of authority, and any act deemed to denigrate the office to which it is attached. Situations like gross misconduct, negligence of duty, or attempts to infringe on fundamental rights could easily fall under this undefined phrase, given the likelihood of harming democratic principles and public trust in the presidency.

In a nutshell, Indian history gives an unambiguous, well-defined mode of removing the President as enshrined under the Indian Constitution; flexibility concerning this term "violation of the Constitution" places enough discretion on the hands of the Judiciary and Parliament so as not to harm the dignity or integrity of that particular position. So, it ensures the presidential office's stability at a point where such responsibility makes the head of that post even more accountable to the people or the nation. It discourages any lax and principled approach to impeachment proceedings, and, therefore, the President of India is a figure devoted to constitutional values.

Procedure For The Impeachment Of The President Of India

Impeachment of the President of India is conferred in Article 61 of the Constitution of India, which safeguards against an abuse of high office. The President can be removed only for "violation of the Constitution," a term undefined in the Constitution. In this respect, Parliament may have to interpret this itself. This stiff soil says so much about the high barrier one has to cross before an impeachment process is triggered and is allowed to unfold-that is the intention of the Constitution to keep the Presidency but, in extreme situations, bring about accountability.

Impeachment can be moved in either House of Parliament. The resolution proposing the impeachment charges must be written by one-fourth of the total number of members of the introducing House; it may be Lok Sabha or Rajya Sabha. Once submitted, the petitioner is given a mandatory 14-day notice to present it to the President in order to give room for response or preparation. At this stage, the President will have ample opportunity to be informed of the charges before the actual proceedings are instituted.

During this notice period, the suggested motion is taken up for discussion within the house, which initiates it. The motion will be considered passed if the initiating house passes it with two-thirds of its total membership. This percentage ensures that only strong cases are carried forward; thus, the scope for frivolous or politically motivated charges is minimized. A motion passed within one house is carried further to the other house within the parliament for discussion.

In the second House, a two-thirds majority of the membership must approve the motion. At this stage, Parliament may raise an investigation committee if the need arises to investigate thoroughly the charges against the President. The two-thirds majority requirement in both Houses clearly shows the gravity of the impeachment process and ensures the process is reserved for the most severe instances of misconduct.

If both Houses assent to the motion with the necessary majority, the President is thus impeached and removed from office. Such a procedure clearly shows the parliamentary supremacy in the process of impeachment, for there is no role played by judicial intervention to determine to impeach, which signifies the independence of Parliament to make the head of state accountable. However, procedure lapses may be taken under judicial review with more oversight to ensure nothing goes against the Constitution.

Though complex and rarely resorted to, the impeachment procedure for the President of India is integral to India's democratic form. It addresses the probable misconduct at the highest echelons with the safeguards of stringent requirements and high majorities that avoid the exploitation of the process, bringing a balance between accountability and stability in the country's system of executive government.

Also Read : Impeachment Of A Supreme Court Judge

Consequences Of Impeachment

On a resolution of impeachment being adopted and on his or her removal, the office of President automatically becomes vacant. Initiation of the process to hold an election for president cannot take place on that very day because the procedure is rather complicated. For this period, the Vice-President assumes the position of Acting President until a full-fledged election for the new President is held. This makes for continuity at the country's highest posts.

After this, an election is conducted based on the constitutional process of electing a new president. The Election Commission manages it with critical time-scale restrictions and guidelines to ensure the process goes smoothly. The Vice-President continues to govern at this time by acting as the President. After the election, the newly elected president will take an oath to assume the office formally. The whole process of such an oath allows for a smooth transition of power, and the leadership remains without interruption, even in the event of an unexpected vacancy in the presidency.

Assuming Of Office By The Vice President

Article 65 of the Indian Constitution mentions the conditions under which the Vice President can discharge the duties of the President. This is highly essential to ensure continuity in the office of the country. Under this article further states that the Vice President shall discharge the functions of, or act as, President under two conditions.

The first situation occurs when there is a vacancy in the presidential office. This can result from several causes, for instance, death of the President, resignation, or even removal. In these circumstances, the president is elected through constitutional processes. This provision ensures no power vacuum, as the country's leadership does not break at transitional times.

The second category refers to situations where, through illness, absence, or some other reason, the President is temporarily incapacitated and unable to function as expected. In such situations, once more, the Vice President acts as the Acting President until such a time that the original President is back to doing his job. Under such conditions, the government goes on in a seamless and unintermittent manner in performing all executive functions as well as decision-making functions.

Even during this interim period of filling a vice-presidency position, if the vacancy is permanent, there must be a presidential election to elect a candidate to fill the post. Such an election takes the procedures prescribed by the Constitution; notably, Article 55 addresses the process for an electoral contest for the presidency. Such a process makes it quite systematic to select the President so that the election remains credible and democratic, a system upon which the nation is based.

Article 65 is one of the essential enablers for the functions of the executive branch of the Government of India. Such a provision is not only a mechanism for the accountability but also shows the flexibility of the constitutional structure to respond to unforeseen situations that might affect the position of the presidency.

Conclusion

The Constitution lays down the process of impeachment of the President, and so far in India, it has never been invoked, nor has any President ever faced the process. However, this provision is essential when there are cases of wrongful or incapacity in carrying out presidential functions. So, including the impeachment process in the Constitution keeps the President answerable for breach of any wrongdoing or misuse. Being a quasi-judicial process, impeachment demands a "special majority" of two-thirds from both houses, a joint committee investigation, and a secret ballot system, thus maintaining fairness and transparency.