What Is Arbitration ?

Arbitration is a widely acknowledged and efficacious alternative dispute resolution mechanism that enables parties to resolve their conflicts without engaging in a lengthy legal battle inside the courtroom. While the preference for arbitration is not surprising, considering its confidentiality, speed, efficiency, flexibility, among others, gradually it is becoming a go-to choice for resolving commercial, cross-border, and other specialized disputes. Unlike litigation, arbitration does not require lawyers but the appointment of one or more arbitrators who are impartial in nature. These arbitrators give a binding decision, known as an ‘award’, after assessing the proof and arguments of both parties. The process of arbitration is contractual in nature.

Key Principles Of Arbitration

Developing a keen understanding of the basic principles of arbitration is necessary to grasp the nuances of its operational framework and appeal. The key principles are as follows:

Consent Of The Parties

The process of arbitration is consensual in nature. Both parties should be inclined to submit their disputes to arbitration. This can happen in two ways.

1. Parties include an arbitration clause in a contract.
2. Parties make a post-dispute agreement.

If parties do not agree on the same or do not follow the aforementioned process, the arbitrator will have no jurisdiction to hear the case.

Neutrality And Impartiality

Neutrality is one of the core principles of arbitration, where not only the selection of arbitrators is such that they have to be impartial, but the procedural and substantive facets of the dispute also follow neutrality. The appointed arbitrators should be impartial towards involved parties, and the venue they select for proceedings should be neutral, not giving any home-court benefit to either party.

Confidentiality

Arbitration proceedings are usually conducted away from the prying eyes of the public. This helps in protecting the sensitive information associated with business or trade secrets revealed during the arbitration proceedings. This is so because the public can generally access records of court proceedings but the same does not apply to the arbitration proceedings.

Binding Nature Of Awards

The final decision given by the arbitrator is known as the arbitral award. This award is binding on the parties and enforceable upon them. If any party wishes to challenge the arbitral award, they can do so on limited grounds, such as fraud, bias, any major irregularity in the procedure, etc.

Party Autonomy

Parties enjoy autonomy in the arbitration proceedings to a major extent which is not possible in the court proceedings. They have the flexibility to choose arbitrators, procedural rules, and the venue for the arbitration proceedings. This helps the parties to design the process in a manner that best suits their needs.

Finality And Limited Appeal

The nature of an arbitration award is usually final. Parties get limited grounds to file for appeal or setting aside an arbitral award. This is done to ensure that the process does not turn out to be lengthy and defeat the purpose of a speedy resolution.

Legal Framework For Arbitration In India

The process of arbitration in India is governed majorly by the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, which closely follows the UNCITRAL (United Nations Commission on International Trade Law) Model Law on International Commercial Arbitration. The regulatory framework followed by subsequent amendments in 2015, 2019, and 2021 forms the cornerstone of arbitration law in India. This law governs the following :

1. Domestic Arbitration
2. International Commercial Arbitration
3. Enforcement of Foreign Awards
4. Conciliation

Key aspects of the Indian legal framework for arbitration include:

Arbitration And Conciliation Act, 1996

An extensive set of guidelines that are applicable to arbitration in India is provided by this Act. It explains how to start an arbitration, how to appoint arbitrators, how to run the processes, and how to enforce rulings. The Act conforms to international agreements including the Geneva and New York conventions by recognizing and upholding foreign arbitral rulings.

Amendments To The Act

The Act has undergone various revisions over the years, most notably in 2015, 2019, and 2021, with the aim of improving efficiency, minimizing court intrusion, and positioning India as a centre for international arbitration. The purpose of these amendments is to encourage institutional arbitration over ad hoc arbitration, expedite procedures, and establish stringent deadlines for concluding proceedings.

Promotion Of Institutional Arbitration

The legal system in India makes a distinction between institutional arbitration—in which the proceedings are managed by an arbitral institution—and ad hoc arbitration, in which the parties handle the process independently. Structured regulations and administrative support are made available to facilitate arbitration by organizations such as the Mumbai Centre for International Arbitration (MCIA) and the Indian Council of Arbitration (ICA).

Types Of Arbitration In India

Various types of arbitration procedures in India are as follows:

Domestic Arbitration

Domestic arbitration refers to the disputes where concerned parties reside in India. The laws referred to for arbitration proceedings are Indian laws.

International Commercial Arbitration

Under International Commercial Arbitration, at least one party is based outside India or the dispute concerning both parties contains international elements.

Ad hoc Arbitration

The arbitration proceedings that are conducted independently by the parties without the help of an arbitral institution are known as Ad hoc Arbitration. Under this, parties themselves choose the procedure they wish to follow. While this type of arbitration lends immense flexibility to both parties, the proceedings get unnecessarily delayed at times, which usually doesn't happen in other types of arbitral proceedings.

Institutional Arbitration

Institutional Arbitrations are usually administered by arbitral institutions, such as ICA or MCIA, that have pre-established rules and administrative support, which streamline the procedure.

Statutory Arbitration

Statutory Arbitration takes place when they are mandated by any statute. These usually take place for specific disputes such as labor laws, family disputes, etc.

Fast Track Arbitration

Fast track arbitration is a speedier version of the arbitration process where a simple process is adopted for the resolution of the dispute and strict timelines are set.

Investment Arbitration

Investment Arbitration caters to disputes taking place between host states and foreign investors where they are governed by bilateral investment treaties.

How Does Arbitration Work?

Arbitration follows a structured yet flexible process. The main stages involved include:

Initiation Of Arbitration

Arbitration starts when any party wishes to resolve a dispute and refers it for arbitration on the basis of a pre-existing arbitration agreement or the clause within the contract. The parties may also choose to arbitrate once the dispute happens.

Appointment Of Arbitrator(s)

The parties have the flexibility to appoint one or more than one arbitrator as per the arbitration agreement. If they are unsuccessful in reaching a common ground, a court or an arbitral institution may appoint the arbitrator(s). The selected arbitrator should be impartial and have the necessary expertise and skills to decide the matter.

Pre-Hearing Procedures

A preliminary hearing is held by the arbitral tribunal to set up deadlines, norms for procedure, and other details. This could entail deciding on the arbitration's location, language, and hearing format (virtual or in person). The parameters of evidence and witness examination are also established during preliminary meetings.

Hearing

Similar to court proceedings, the arbitration includes the presentation of proof by involved parties. They have to supply the evidence to support their arguments. However, in contrast to court proceedings, arbitration proceedings are more flexible and informal in nature. The proceedings are designed as per the needs and preference of the parties and the nature of the dispute. While cross-examination of witnesses and expert testimonies do happen, they are not strictly mandatory procedures.

Rendering Of The Award

The arbitrator or arbitrators discuss and give a binding decision on the basis of proof and the laws governing the arbitration proceeding. This binding decision is known as an arbitral award. Under this award, the arbitrator(s) may grant remedies to the parties such as damages, specific performance, etc. It is necessary for parties to enforce the award unless it is challenged on legitimate grounds.

Enforcement Of Award

Once the arbitrator(s) render the arbitral award, parties have to enforce it in the Indian courts in accordance with the Arbitration and Conciliation Act. It should be done with the knowledge that no challenge is filed within the prescribed period. Foreign awards are enforceable as per the New York or Geneva Conventions.

Key Advantages Of Arbitration

Arbitration offers several advantages that make it a preferred choice for resolving disputes:

Time Efficiency

While litigation often spans years, arbitration is usually speedier than litigation. It does not have the procedure delays that can be observed in the traditional court system. Parties have the flexibility to set their own deadlines and schedules so it helps in swift resolutions.

Confidentiality

Arbitration proceedings take place behind closed doors and this private nature of the process helps in protecting sensitive information related to business, trade secrets or any such information revealed during the process. This is crucial for companies who wish to resolve a dispute without tarnishing their reputation and goodwill in the eyes of the general public.

Control And Flexibility

Arbitration provides immense flexibility and control to both parties when it comes to choosing arbitrations, picking procedural rules that would govern the proceedings, choosing the venue and language of the arbitration.

Specialized Expertise

Particularly in technical disputes, parties can select arbitrators with specialized legal or industry knowledge to ensure well-informed and accurate decision-making.

Cross-Border Enforceability

When it comes to international conflicts, arbitral awards are more certain than court rulings because they are enforceable in numerous jurisdictions under the New York Convention.

Limited Appeals

There are few grounds for contesting an arbitral award, which guarantees that cases are settled more quickly than in litigation, where there are frequently several stages of appeal.

Limitations And Challenges Of Arbitration In India

Despite its advantages, arbitration in India faces several limitations and challenges:

Judicial Intervention and Delays

The appointment of arbitrators and the enforcement of awards are two instances of excessive judicial intervention that slow down arbitration and make it nearly as time-consuming as litigation.

High Costs

Arbitration can be expensive, with high fees for arbitrators and centers, especially in complex cases. Legal and administrative costs often escalate, making it unaffordable for smaller businesses.

Unpredictable And Inconsistent Awards

Inconsistent rulings result from lack of agreement among arbitrators. The finality and credibility of arbitral rulings are further compromised by the prospect of appeals and judicial review.

Enforcement Challenges

It can be challenging to enforce arbitral awards made abroad and domestically in India since Indian courts frequently review and allow the execution of awards based on procedural and public policy considerations.

Limited Expertise And Professionalism

The lack of experienced arbitrators, especially in rural areas, raises questions about prejudice and erratic rulings, which undermines the legitimacy of arbitration in India.

Inadequate Institutional Support

The effectiveness and desirability of arbitration are impacted by India's underdeveloped arbitration infrastructure in comparison to other countries. This includes a restricted use of technology and a lack of institutional resources.

Arbitration vs. Other Dispute Resolution Mechanisms

People Also Read : Litigation vs. Arbitration: Know the Differance

When To Choose Arbitration Over Other Methods

Arbitration can be chosen over other methods in the following cases:

Complex Commercial Disputes

When the nature of commercial dispute is technical or specialized in nature and someone with the knowledge of that field is required to resolve the matter.

Cross-Border Issues

When it comes to cross-border conflicts, arbitration can prove beneficial as it provides neutrality and enforceability.

Confidentiality

When parties are dealing with a matter that calls for confidentiality considering the sensitive nature of the information being disclosed or trade secrets revealed, arbitration is the perfect choice as it lends the much-needed confidential environment.

Speedy Resolution

When parties do not want to get embroiled in a lengthy legal battle or don’t have much time to spare and need speedy resolution, arbitration is the best choice.

Recent Developments In Arbitration Law In India

Perkins Eastman Architects DPC v. HSCC (India) Ltd. (2019)

In this matter, the Apex Court stated that when a person is not eligible to act as an arbitrator, the same person cannot appoint an arbitrator. The judgement emphasized upon the need of impartiality in the arbitration proceeding.

Bharat Aluminium Co. v. Kaiser Aluminium Technical Services (2012):

In this landmark ruling, the Court held that when it comes to foreign seated international commercial arbitrations, Part I of the Arbitration and the Conciliation Act, 1996 is not applicable. It reduced intervention by the Indian courts, acknowledged party autonomy and jurisdiction of the arbitral tribunals.

Hindustan Construction Company Ltd. v. Union of India (2020)

In this case, the automatic stay on the enforcement of arbitral awards upon filing an application to set aside the award was declared unconstitutional by the Supreme Court.

Vidya Drolia & Ors. v. Durga Trading Corporation (2020)

In this case, the Supreme Court threw light on the concept of arbitrability in India and stated that matters related to tenancy, intellectual property, and fraud can be taken up for arbitration. However, it should be done after ensuring that these matters do not provide for adjudication by statutory authorities.

FAQs

Q1. How is arbitration different from litigation?

Arbitration is a process of alternative dispute resolution mechanism where matters are resolved away from the prying eyes of the public, by an independent arbitrator unlike traditional courts. While litigation takes place in the open and in a formal setting, the arbitration process is more time-effective, cost-effective, and less formal. The decision rendered by the arbitrator(s) is called an arbitral award which is binding and enforceable on usually the same footing as a court judgement.

Q2. What nature of disputes can be resolved through arbitration?

Commercial, contractual, labor, and international conflicts are appropriate for arbitration. It cannot, however, be applied to criminal proceedings, matrimonial cases, bankruptcy, or anything pertaining to public policy.

Q3. Is it mandatory for the parties to have an arbitration agreement in place before choosing arbitration to resolve the dispute?

Yes, arbitration calls for a written agreement between the parties, which is usually found in a contract. Important terms including arbitrator selection and procedural norms are defined in this agreement. Arbitration cannot proceed without it because it is a consensual process.

Q4.Who has the power to appoint an arbitrator and what qualification must an arbitrator possess?

Typically, parties choose arbitrators in accordance with their agreement. A court or other organization may appoint them if they are unable to agree. Arbitrators need to be impartial and frequently possess knowledge pertinent to the type of dispute at hand.